nav-left cat-right

Know the facts about New Medical Treatments

Until recently, it was thought that those who declined medical attention had a mental illness. It was suspected that the patient’s ability to draw the conclusion that medication was the only viable choice was being hindered by unreasonable anxiety, mistaken judgement, or suicidal tendencies. Only recently has the medical profession started to accept the possibility that rejecting traditional medical care may be a fair and educated decision taken by someone in full control of his or her faculties.Do you want to learn more? Visit original site

While this definition was discussed in the model patient’s bill of rights in the 1970s and suggested in the principles of informed consent, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons introduced a list of freedoms that should be granted to all patients in 1990, which included the freedom to reject medical care even though it was recommended by their physician. Doctors, understandably, find it difficult to accept when their car model is questioned. They are often troubled by the patient’s decision and will continue to try to convince them to change their minds; some will be worried about defending themselves in the event the patient or family tries to sue for poor treatment later. Treatment refusers (also known as “refuseniks”) are often in the early stages of their disease, and the treatments they reject are considered “active” in the sense that they are intended to cure or control the illness rather than “palliative” in the sense that they are intended to simply console the patient. Although Christian Scientists who rely on prayer or Jehovah’s Witnesses who reject blood transfusions make headlines, the majority of people who refuse care are not doing so for religious purposes or because they distrust modern medicine. In reality, many patients will consider part of a doctor’s prescription – for example, surgery to remove a tumour – but refuse follow-up treatment like chemotherapy or radiation.